Eric S asked:


I’m thinking if you were a Southern merchant in 1845, and you knew the slave trade was soon gonna end, you would sell short on the commodity like any other commodity.

You’d borrow slaves from a neighbor, then sell them to a third party, and then on a contracted date, you’d buy back the slaves and return them to the neighbor.

If you timed it just right, you’d be buying back the slaves right before slavery was illegalized, you’d pay 0.000005 cents per slave, plus interest, and keep the proceeds.

How come no Southerners tried this? They could have also used this money to fund the war on either side, North or South. You could do this also as a way to raise money to back the Union.
The South during reconstruction was impoverished and destroyed by the circumstances resulting from the Civil War and the destruction of towns like Vicksburg, Mississippi (not that the South wasn’t to blame).

But I’m just curious if any Southern folks actually ironically profited by selling short.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Diigo
  • Faves
  • LinkaGoGo
  • MisterWong
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Tagged with:

Filed under: Commodity Trading

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!